Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1699

reference
95-tree-1
name
1699
tree-preservation-order

undefined

95-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.007384 50.863370)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.007313 50.863363,-1.007316 50.863376,-1.007326 50.863389,-1.007341 50.863399,-1.007361 50.863406,-1.007383 50.863408,-1.007405 50.863406,-1.007425 50.863400,-1.007441 50.863390,-1.007451 50.863378,-1.007455 50.863364,-1.007452 50.863350,-1.007442 50.863337,-1.007426 50.863327,-1.007407 50.863321,-1.007385 50.863318,-1.007363 50.863320,-1.007343 50.863326,-1.007327 50.863336,-1.007317 50.863349,-1.007313 50.863363)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL